<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Web Semantic &#187; pellet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewebsemantic.com/category/pellet/rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewebsemantic.com</link>
	<description>data for humans and computers and the tools that make it available</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 23:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>I do not think it means what you think it means</title>
		<link>http://www.thewebsemantic.com/2007/08/29/i-do-not-think-it-means-what-you-think-it-means/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thewebsemantic.com/2007/08/29/i-do-not-think-it-means-what-you-think-it-means/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tcowan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[jena]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pellet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[semanticweb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewebsemantic.com/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently been working with Jena and Pellet. At the outset I was enthusiastic about all the interesting implications a reasoner had for my ontology. Being familiar with the &#8220;classify ontology&#8221; buttons in Protege, as well as the &#8220;inferred types&#8221; tabs, I had in mind that Pellet would be able to take instance information and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thewebsemantic.com/2007/08/29/i-do-not-think-it-means-what-you-think-it-means/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
